Tesla Nikola Inventos

0 out of 5

Descripción

Tesla Nikola Inventos

Godelieve    Van    Overmeire

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NIKOLA   TESLA   INVENTIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Godelieve Van Overmeire

 

From manufactinteract@hotmail.com Sat Apr 11 06:53:01 1998

From: manufactinteract@hotmail.com (Jan Lee)

Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 23:53:01 ‑0500

 

There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS on duplicating, publishing

or distributing the files except where noted!

September 2, 1993

MIR1.ASC

 

‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑‑‑

This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Steve Gantt.

 

‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑‑‑

MIR1.asc

July 1993

 

‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑‑‑

The following excerpts are a summary of the research underway

by Nicholas Reiter. Nicholas is a graduate of Terra Technical

College, and is a professional research technologist for  a solar

cell

manufacturing firm. He  about  thirty  years old and has been

interested in the UFO phenomena all his life. The following is

a  brief of the summarization of his research as outlined in Dr.

David

Gotlib’s Bulletin of  Anomalous  Experience;  «Magnetic  Implant

Response» and «Magnetism, UFO Abductions  and  the  Anomalous».

Nicholas does not belong to any large UFO group ( e.g.  MUFON,

CUFOS, etc. ) and has been involved in this research for the past

three years. Some of the following «quoted» passages are directly

from sources listed above.

 

New observations which may well be some of the most significant

discoveries made in regard to abductions, UFOS and mind control

were  first investigated in  the  Autumn  of  1990. These tests

and  experiments were performed by Nicholas Reiter and his

colleague (AR)  in the Dallas area with confirmed abductees using

a techniques that  can easily be duplicated.

 

The objectives of these two were;

 

  1. Can the UFO abduction process be understood in the terms of

specific technology?

  1. Can the abduction implant devices, recalled so often under

hypnosis, be objectively detected,  studied,  and possibly

neutralized by electrical, magnetic, or otherwise  energy‑

related means?

  1. Can a system of defense be developed against the protocol

?

 

Assumptions for the research/experimentation;

 

  1. There exists an intelligence, of unknown origin and nature,Ô ø*          p‑à+à+@ @    Ô

which is currently carrying out an agenda of experimentation,

manipulation, and/or resource acquisition using the human race,

 

Page 1  or certain members thereof, as unwilling subjects.

  1. The agenda given in assumption 1 is being carried out with

the use of highly advanced technology.

  1. This technology appears to be, at least partially, based on

forms of energy, or energy‑matter relationships, which are

currently unknown to, or unacknowledged, by classical physics.

  1. The human race has the undeniable right to defend itself to

the best of it’s ability, against the abduction agenda.

 

The first set of experiments involved trying to find a means to

elicit a tangible objective response from abduction implant

devices. AR first noticed a «weird» sensation in her volunteers

when a large  ( flux density measured at approx. 2000 gauss)

horseshoe magnet had  been held up to the region of the

volunteers head where, under  hypnosis, the volunteer had

recalled aliens «doing something to  her». The sensation was

extraordinary vivid and disturbing to the  volunteer. It seemed

to be both mental and physiological in nature.  In nearest terms

it was a «panic» response, a mental feeling of  terror or extreme

apprehension, coupled with a verified rise in

pulse rate and perspiration.

 

The volunteer (V#1),  said  that the panic response seemed to

duplicate the feeling that she had been subject to in the past,

shortly before an abduction related event would occur. Over the

course of the following weeks several different tests were

conducted  with the subject V#1.

  1. A large electromagnet ( 1000 turns of #14 AWG wrapped around

an iron core) was substituted for the horseshoe magnet. This

coil was energized both with 110VAC and later with 6VDC, in

different tests.  The response for both were smaller in

magnitude than the horseshoe magnet although the symptoms were

the same.

 

  1. While using the horseshoe magnet a piece of steel was placed

between the poles to divert the magnetic flux away from any

external regions of the magnet. This test was performed to

determine if the actual flux lines were involved in the response

or whether the response was based on other «virtual» effects of

magnet.

 

  1. The response (hereafter called the Magnetic Implant Response

or MIR) seemed to first appear when the magnet was moved  within

18 inches of the volunteer’s response region (area of

the implant).  From  this distance inward, the intensity

increased.

 

  1. The Tesla Coil Suppression Effect (TCSE) was discovered.

This will be discussed later.

 

Nicholas and AR then started testing other volunteers in Jan

  1. Previous to this their research was being performed with

the assistance of V#1 only. On Jan 8, they tested anotherÔ     ø*          p‑à+à+@ @    Ô

confirmed volunteer. No communication was allowed between V#1 and

V#2. The symptoms experienced by V#2 were identical to those of

V#1. Over the course of the next few months, two other volunteers

were  tested. V#3 showed a positive reaction with consistent

symptoms.

V#4 however, felt no response or sensations.

 

Page 2

Nicholas and AR started researching the nature of the abductions

experienced by all volunteers. They found that V#1, V#2 and V#3

were «classical» abductees, though their specific experiences and

ordeals were different. Each recalled, during either their

regression, or  waking memories, the phenomena most often

experienced by those who have been repeatedly abducted (e.g. Grey

entities, quasi‑medical  protocols, possible implant insertion,

etc.).  V#4’s  abduction experience were quite «non‑standard» and

may involve  different  phenomena.

 

It was decided that the research should then continue. The

second  phase of experimentation continued. AR reported the

following; V#1  was placed in a chair, and was tested for MIR.

Results were  positive. An 18 inch tall Tesla spark gap coil was

set up in front  on V#1. The coil was turned on and allowed to

operate for several  minutes ( then coil’s power was adjusted to

produce a  4 inch  discharge at the secondary. Exact construction

details are available

from Nicholas Reiter).

 

V#1 was then checked for MIR and the results were negative. The

MIR  had vanished. V#1 was checked again 24 hours later and the

results were still negative. The nullifying effect lasted for

approximately  six days. When it DID return it was at a much

diminished magnitude.  From this observation it was inferred that

the MIR had not been eliminated, but had been in some  way

deadened or temporarily  stunned.

V#2 was similarly tested with the Tesla coil and the results were

identical. The MIR ceased for a period of time.

 

Another interesting effect was noticed by V#1. She was given the

Tesla coil to take home with her. On several occasions,

specifically on certain evenings V#1 would get the feeling that

unseen entities were nearby. She found that by switching on the

tesla coil, the sensation would vanish, as though the coil was

disrupting or driving away the invisible force.

 

This concludes the  studies  performed  by  Nicholas Reiter in

conjunction with AR.

 

Nicholas has continued his research. Lack of volunteers prompted

him to start research in a slightly different vein. He started

testing  subjects randomly, business associates, friends, family,

and people  on the street were tested with some surprising

results.

 

The subjects were told that some people have the ability to

«sense»  magnetic fields for unknown reasons and that heÔ     ø*          p‑à+à+@ @    Ô

(Nicholas) would  like to determine if they ( the

volunteers/subjects) can detect them  as well.

The volunteers were placed in a comfortable chair. A galvanic

skin  response indicator was placed on the second and third

fingers of the  left hand. The volunteer was then shown the

magnet (similar to the  one used in the original experiments).

The volunteer is asked to  verbalize any feelings or sensations

which they might experience  during the test. The subject is then

blindfolded and a few minutes  are allowed to let the galvanic

skin response monitor to «settle

out».

 

Page 3

At this point, the magnet is then moved slowly and randomly

around  the head. Spacing is kept at two inches at all times from

the  subjects head. Sensations, feelings and GSP monitor response

are  observed and recorded. When the test is completed the

volunteers are  thanked and released. If permitted the age, sex,

occupation and  names were recorded.

 

Out of the first 24 subjects tested 5 showed a positive response

to  this procedure. One or more of the following characteristics

were  noted in each case;

 

  1. A feeling of apprehension or panic.
  2. A sensation of pressure or tightness
  3. A feeling of disorientation
  4. Dark, formless shape moving against closed eyelids.
  5. Uncontrollable finger twitching

 

None of the  five random positive response cases were totally

identical in symptom. However, the following characteristics were

common in all five cases;

 

  1. The feeling was weird or unpleasant.
  2. Extreme nervousness and anxiety was present
  3. The effect was vivid and definite.
  4. The GSR monitor tone increased, indicating increased bodily

perspiration.

  1. The response occurred at a single, definitive location on

each subjects head.

The areas included were;

Case #6 ‑ behind and below the left ear.

Case #2 ‑ left temple ( in front of, and slightly above left

ear)

Case #3 ‑ «above nose, somewhere between and behind the eyes.

Case #13 ‑ Left temple

Case #21 ‑ Above and slightly behind left ear

 

‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑‑‑

The above test results were obtained during 1991 and published

that  same year. further testing is being done at this time.

Nicholas has  designed some electronic equipment dealing with a

«security» system  or abduction prevention equipment. The

description and plans for  these devices and being processed into files which may be downloaded  from HIGH SCIENCE (713) 688‑2030. Or may be available from the BBS  carrying this file.

 

This is the first of these files and subsequent files are being  processed.

 

Nicholas Reiter may be contacted at;

Nicholas Reiter

541 W. Stone St.

Gibsonburg, Ohio 43431

 

OR  c/o High Science BBS

(713) 688‑2030 (modem)

9600 baud 24 hours/day 7 days/week

 

 

 

 

 

************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

 

 

 

 

©

 

 

 

 

INFORMACIÓN   EN   EL ARCHIVO   DE     MADAME  GODELIEVE   VAN OVERMEIRE    ( BRUSELAS  ,  BÉLGICA ).

 

 

Documents  from   the   private   files  of

 

Madame   Godelieve   Van   Overmeire

 

(  Brussels   ,   Belgium  )